Digital recruitment: more information, more places to search
The internet solved the old problem of access to job offers. It also created a new one: candidates often move between many job boards, social networks and private contacts. KAYROMA survey data suggests that the digital labour market can be rich in information and difficult to navigate at the same time.
Over the last decade, job searching moved online to a degree that transformed recruitment. The challenge is no longer only access to vacancies. Increasingly, it is finding the right information among many channels, copies, algorithms and notifications.
The internet created an electronic labour market
The OECD describes online job postings as an important source of information about local labour markets and skills demand. Digital recruitment has reached a scale where data scraped from job platforms is now used to analyse changes in labour demand with very short delays.
This is a major change from the labour market of a decade ago. A candidate no longer depends on a newspaper, employment office or a single vacancy board. In minutes, they can see opportunities from many regions and countries. The advantage has a cost: the market is split across many platforms and channels.
What the KAYROMA survey shows
In the KAYROMA study, the average rating for the burden of using multiple portals was 6.4/10. More than half of participants who answered this question — 52% — rated the burden at 7–10.
Fragmentation is even clearer in the job-source question. The average study participant selected 4.1 sources and 61% used at least four. The most common were Pracuj and friend referrals, followed by LinkedIn, personal networks, OLX and Facebook.
This matters because even candidates using major job boards do not abandon other channels. Formal platforms, social media, personal networks and referrals operate in parallel. Job searching has become a multi-channel process.
More information does not automatically mean better matching
In theory, more vacancies should increase the chance of finding a suitable job. In practice, candidates must judge which source is current, whether a posting is duplicated, whether the description reflects real conditions and whether an application is worth the time.
Open KAYROMA responses repeatedly ask for greater transparency: salary ranges, precise duties, current postings, information about the team, better search and direct contact. These are not requests for more vacancies. They are requests for better information.
How the market changed over ten years
In the middle of the previous decade, a job portal was primarily a place to publish advertisements. Today digital recruitment includes professional networks, classic job boards, social media, mobile apps, company career pages, industry groups and personal networks. Algorithms increasingly filter candidates and vacancies as well.
This evolution expanded reach but also raised the cost of attention. Candidates track multiple places, update profiles, react to notifications and often repeat similar information in different systems. Companies publish across channels and receive applications with very different levels of fit.
KAYROMA Research conclusion
The key resource in modern recruitment is no longer simply the number of listings. It is the ability to reduce noise and show the right opportunity to the right person at the right moment.
KAYROMA data does not prove that platform fragmentation is the only cause of job-search difficulty. It does show that multi-channel searching is itself a burden for a meaningful share of participants. This is another sign that the future of the digital labour market may depend less on producing more postings and more on ordering and matching them well.
Europe 2015–2025: from unemployment to the matching problem Back to analysis 01